Can You Use Schematic From Review Articles in Your Poster

All journal information and instructions compiled in one document (PDF) in just one mouse-click Download Guide for Authors in PDF

Announcement: From January 2020, Journal of Functional Foods is an open access periodical. Authors who publish in the Journal volition be able to make their work immediately, permanently, and freely accessible.

Journal of Functional Foods continues with the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Nosotros give authors the possibility to publish their meridian-quality papers in a well-established leading journal in the nutrient and nutrition fields. The Journal will keep its rigorous criteria to screen high impact enquiry addressing relevant scientific topics and performed past sound methodologies.

Elsevier works with institutions and funding bodies to help authors publishing in our journals comply with open up admission policies. Find out hither if your institute is part of an Elsevier agreement.

The Periodical of Functional Foods aims to bring together the results of fundamental and applied inquiry into good for you foods and biologically agile food ingredients.
The Periodical is centered in the specific expanse at the boundaries among food technology, nutrition and health welcoming papers having a good interdisciplinary approach. The Journal will cover the fields of plant bioactives; dietary fibre, probiotics; functional lipids; bioactive peptides; vitamins, minerals and botanicals and other dietary supplements. Nutritional and technological aspects related to the development of functional foods and beverages are of core involvement to the periodical. Experimental works dealing with food digestion, bioavailability of food bioactives and on the mechanisms by which foods and their components are able to modulate physiological parameters connected with disease prevention are of particular interest besides as those dealing with personalized nutrition and nutritional needs in pathological subjects.

Papers will encompass topics such as new food bioactives; efficacy and safety of bioactive compounds, and other healthy food constituents using genomic, chemical and biochemical technologies.
Characterisation of healthy foods and functional constituents with reference to product evolution; grooming of natural and synthetic ingredients for use in foods, effects of processing (including packaging and storage) on functionality and improvement of production quality; verification, quality control and traceability of natural and synthetic functional food ingredients and products volition be considered.
The regulatory aspects of functional foods and related issues e.m. labelling, substantiation of health claims are also of interest together with those dealing with the value creation on the food chains based on the nutritional/good for you aspects.

The post-obit papers are not within the scope of the Journal:

  • Papers only dealing with food assay and label of food structure and composition
  • Papers focusing on the assimilation kinetic of single bioactives
  • Papers dealing with pure compounds having no connection with food

Periodical of Functional Foods follows the publishing practices by Elsevier. Please read advisedly this guide and specially the "Essentials" at the end of the file before submitting your commodity.

Types of paper

Original research articles, review papers, perspective commentaries and opinion pieces, and rapid communications.

i. Research papers - original full-length enquiry papers which accept not been published previously, except in a preliminary form, and which should non exceed 7,500 words. (excluding abstract, references and no more than 8 tables and illustrations)
2. Review manufactures - volition be accepted in areas of topical interest, will normally focus on literature published over the previous 5 years, and should not exceed ten,000 words. (exlcuding abstract, references and no more than 8 tables and illustrations)
3. Perspective commentaries and opinion pieces - These should be concise, on hot topics and describe cutting-edge developments and technologies. They should not exceed 2000 words.
iv. Rapid communications - Brusque communications of upwards to 3000 words, describing work that may be of a preliminary nature but which merits firsthand publication.
Graphical Reviews (GRs) are a short, structured article blazon, which primarily use illustrative schematic summaries to convey only key concepts and novel ideas on a major research interest. GRs are designed to communicate information in a visually appealing representation of the current state of research on a specific topic. The overall message should be attainable to a broad scientific audition. GRs have a format of 3-five (colour) schemes/figures, ideally formatted as easily downloadable (PowerPoint) slides or the like, for employ by readers for educational purposes. The text body should provide the reader with 'backbone' information and context, connecting the material presented in the figures. GRs cannot include unpublished data, new hypotheses, formal mathematical models, or meta-analysis. GR Article Structure:

  1. Abstract: upward to 250 words
  2. Body (exclusive of figure legends): upwardly to 2000 words
  3. 3-5 color schemes/figures summarizing the state of the specific topic covered. Each effigy needs to exist self-explanatory, including sufficient annotations to allow the readers to chop-chop grasp the content of the figure
  4. Figure legends must be straight to the betoken, providing boosted details which deepen the bulletin of the figure itself. Please ensure that the reader, who may not exist a direct adept in the field, can easily grasp the information provided.
  5. References: no more than 25 key articles that exemplify the most significant recent advances in the field.

An example of GR is available here.

Submission checklist

You can use this list to comport out a final check of your submission before you transport information technology to the journal for review. Please cheque the relevant section in this Guide for Authors for more details.

Ensure that the following items are present:

One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
• Eastward-post accost
• Total postal accost

All necessary files have been uploaded:
Manuscript:
• Include keywords
• All figures (include relevant captions)
• All tables (including titles, description, footnotes)
• Ensure all figure and table citations in the text match the files provided
• Indicate clearly if color should be used for any figures in print
Graphical Abstracts / Highlights files (where applicative)
Supplemental files (where applicable)

Further considerations
• Manuscript has been 'spell checked' and 'grammar checked'
• All references mentioned in the Reference List are cited in the text, and vice versa
• Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted fabric from other sources (including the Internet)
• A competing interests statement is provided, even if the authors accept no competing interests to declare
• Periodical policies detailed in this guide accept been reviewed
• Referee suggestions and contact details provided, based on journal requirements

For further information, visit our Support Center.

Authors should include a argument in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with homo subjects. The privacy rights of man subjects must always exist observed.

All animal experiments should comply with the Arrive guidelines and should be carried out in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Human action, 1986 and associated guidelines, Eu Directive 2010/63/Eu for fauna experiments, or the National Research Council's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the authors should conspicuously indicate in the manuscript that such guidelines have been followed. The sex activity of animals must be indicated, and where appropriate, the influence (or clan) of sex on the results of the written report.

Declaration of interest

All authors must disclose whatever financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their piece of work. Examples of potential competing interests include employment, consultancies, stock buying, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Authors must disclose any interests in two places: 1. A summary declaration of interest statement in the championship folio file (if double anonymized) or the manuscript file (if single anonymized). If at that place are no interests to declare so delight country this: 'Declarations of interest: none'. 2. Detailed disclosures as role of a divide Proclamation of Involvement form, which forms role of the journal's official records. It is important for potential interests to exist declared in both places and that the information matches. More data.

Submission declaration and verification

Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstruse, a published lecture or academic thesis, see 'Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication' for more than information), that information technology is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the piece of work was carried out, and that, if accustomed, it will not be published elsewhere in the aforementioned class, in English or in whatsoever other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder. To verify originality, your commodity may be checked past the originality detection service Crossref Similarity Check.

Preprints
Delight annotation that preprints tin exist shared anywhere at any time, in line with Elsevier's sharing policy. Sharing your preprints due east.g. on a preprint server will not count as prior publication (see 'Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication' for more information).

Use of inclusive linguistic communication

Inclusive linguistic communication acknowledges diversity, conveys respect to all people, is sensitive to differences, and promotes equal opportunities. Content should brand no assumptions near the behavior or commitments of whatever reader; contain nothing which might imply that ane individual is superior to some other on the grounds of age, gender, race, ethnicity, civilization, sexual orientation, disability or wellness condition; and use inclusive language throughout. Authors should ensure that writing is free from bias, stereotypes, slang, reference to ascendant culture and/or cultural assumptions. We propose to seek gender neutrality by using plural nouns ("clinicians, patients/clients") as default/wherever possible to avert using "he, she," or "he/she." We recommend avoiding the use of descriptors that refer to personal attributes such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, inability or health condition unless they are relevant and valid. When coding terminology is used, we recommend to avoid offensive or exclusionary terms such as "master", "slave", "blacklist" and "whitelist". Nosotros propose using alternatives that are more advisable and (self-) explanatory such as "principal", "secondary", "blocklist" and "allowlist". These guidelines are meant every bit a point of reference to help identify appropriate language simply are by no means exhaustive or definitive.

Author contributions

For transparency, we encourage authors to submit an writer statement file outlining their individual contributions to the paper using the relevant CRediT roles: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resource; Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization; Roles/Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing. Authorship statements should be formatted with the names of authors first and CRediT role(due south) following. More than details and an example.

Changes to authorship

Authors are expected to consider carefully the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript and provide the definitive list of authors at the time of the original submission. Any addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship listing should be fabricated only before the manuscript has been accustomed and only if approved by the periodical Editor. To request such a change, the Editor must receive the following from the corresponding author: (a) the reason for the change in author list and (b) written confirmation (e-mail service, letter) from all authors that they agree with the improver, removal or rearrangement. In the case of add-on or removal of authors, this includes confirmation from the author beingness added or removed.
But in exceptional circumstances will the Editor consider the improver, deletion or rearrangement of authors later the manuscript has been accustomed. While the Editor considers the asking, publication of the manuscript volition be suspended. If the manuscript has already been published in an online upshot, whatever requests canonical by the Editor will result in a corrigendum.

Copyright

Upon credence of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Periodical Publishing Understanding' (see more information on this). An electronic mail will exist sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' course or a link to the online version of this agreement.

Author rights
As an writer you (or your employer or establishment) have certain rights to reuse your work. More information.

Elsevier supports responsible sharing
Find out how you can share your inquiry published in Elsevier journals.

Role of the funding source

You are requested to identify who provided fiscal support for the bear of the enquiry and/or grooming of the article and to briefly describe the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such interest, it is recommended to state this.

Language (usage and editing services)
Delight write your text in practiced English language (American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these). Authors who feel their English language manuscript may crave editing to eliminate possible grammatical or spelling errors and to accommodate to correct scientific English may wish to use the English Language Editing service bachelor from Elsevier's Author Services.

Authors whose native language is not English are strongly advised to have their manuscripts checked by an English language-speaking colleague prior to submission.

Submission

Our online submission organisation guides you stepwise through the process of entering your article details and uploading your files. The system converts your commodity files to a single PDF file used in the peer-review process. Editable files (e.g., Word, LaTeX) are required to typeset your commodity for terminal publication. All correspondence, including notification of the Editor's decision and requests for revision, is sent by e-mail.

Authors must provide and employ an email address unique to themselves and non shared with another author registered in Editorial Manager, or a department.

Referees

Authors are required to submit, with the manuscript, the names, addresses and electronic mail addresses of iii potential referees. Note that the editor retains the sole right to decide whether or not the suggested reviewers are used.

The suggested reviewers should not come up from the same institute, and should not all come from the same state.

Review Policy

A peer review organisation involving two or more reviewers is used to ensure high quality of manuscripts accepted for publication. The Managing Editor and Editors accept the right to decline formal review of a manuscript when information technology is deemed that the manuscript is
i) on a topic exterior the scope of the Periodical;
ii) lacking technical merit;
3) present limited innovation and originality;
iv) focused on foods or processes that are of narrow regional scope and significance;
5) fragmentary and providing marginally incremental results; or
half-dozen) is poorly written.

Queries

For questions about the editorial process (including the status of manuscripts nether review) or for technical back up on submissions, please visit our Back up Centre.

Peer review

This journal operates a single blind review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible for the terminal determination regarding acceptance or rejection of manufactures. The Editor's decision is final and although oftentimes disappointing it is non useful to send complaint messages to them. More information on types of peer review.

Utilize of word processing software
It is important that the file exist saved in the native format of the word processor used. The text should be in single-cavalcade format. Continue the layout of the text as simple equally possible. About formatting codes will be removed and replaced on processing the article. In item, practise non utilize the word processor'due south options to justify text or to hyphenate words. Still, exercise use assuming face, italics, subscripts, superscripts etc. When preparing tables, if you are using a table grid, use just 1 grid for each individual table and not a filigree for each row. If no grid is used, use tabs, not spaces, to align columns. The electronic text should be prepared in a style very similar to that of conventional manuscripts (come across also the Guide to Publishing with Elsevier). Note that source files of figures, tables and text graphics will exist required whether or non you embed your figures in the text. Come across also the section on Electronic artwork.
To avert unnecessary errors yous are strongly advised to use the 'spell-check' and 'grammar-bank check' functions of your give-and-take processor.

Embrace Letter

Manuscript submissions must exist accompanied by a encompass letter of the alphabet. The corresponding author must state explicitly in a paragraph how the paper fits the Aims and Scope of the journal. The cover letter should as well outline the

significance and novelty

of the piece of work. Make clear in the alphabetic character to the editor the relevance of your paper to the area of the interest for JFF and to the specific research field.

Authors are invited to briefly comment on their expertise in the field of study thing and if appropriate, provide examples of their ain related publications on this topic, explaining how the presented research relates to recently published (or submitted) piece of work from the corresponding author's own research group.

Whatsoever argument regarding ethics, conflict of interest or duplicate submission should exist included in the cover letter.

For Review type of articles, authors must likewise annotate on related reviews published on the topic and how their manuscript provides relevant new insights and perspective beyond the available reviews.

Merely submissions following these requests will be considered.

Commodity structure

Subdivision - numbered sections
Split your article into conspicuously divers and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1.1 (and so 1.1.1, 1.ane.2, ...), 1.2, etc. (the abstract is non included in section numbering). Use this numbering also for internal cantankerous-referencing: do not only refer to 'the text'. Any subsection may be given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own split line.

Introduction
State the objectives of the piece of work and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results. The last sentence of the introduction should state the aim of the paper.

Material and methods
Provide sufficient detail to allow the piece of work to be reproduced. Methods already published on peer reviewed manufactures could exist indicated by a reference and only relevant modifications should exist described. Authors must provide all the details nearly their starting material, the source, the bioactive components responsible for the observed effects and changes in their content upon processing. Details of the ethical committees authorization should provide here when necessary. The last paragraph of the session should provide the details of the statistical methodology.

Results
Results should be clear and concise.The figures to highlight the nigh relevant findings of the paper and practise non replicate the same data both in figures and tables. Be certain the numbers and the messages are not too small and in the different colors are conspicuously distinguishable.

Discussion
This should explore the significance of the results of the piece of work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Give-and-take department is often advisable for the type of commodity published.

Conclusions
The main conclusions of the study may exist presented in a short Conclusions department, which may stand alone or class a subsection of the Results and Discussion section. The conclusions should be supported by the study results and non be overstated.

Supplementary material/Appendices
JFF do non encourage the use of supplemnetary material nevertheless when providing additional data is necessary to support newspaper results and favor the repeatability of the study you can upload this on a separate file.

Tables and figures should be given separate numbering: Tabular array S1; Figure S1,...

Title page information
Title. Concise and informative. Titles are oft used in information-retrieval systems. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible.
Writer names and affiliations. Please clearly indicate the given proper name(s) and family name(s) of each author and check that all names are accurately spelled. Nowadays the authors' amalgamation addresses (where the actual work was done) beneath the names. Indicate all affiliations with a lower-instance superscript alphabetic character immediately after the author'southward name and in forepart of the advisable address. Provide the full postal address of each affiliation, including the country proper noun and, if available, the email address of each author.
Corresponding writer. Clearly signal who volition handle correspondence at all stages of refereeing and publication, also postal service-publication. Ensure that the eastward-mail service address is given and that contact details are kept up to appointment by the corresponding author.
Present/permanent address. If an author has moved since the work described in the article was done, or was visiting at the fourth dimension, a 'Present accost' (or 'Permanent address') may be indicated as a footnote to that author's name. The accost at which the writer really did the work must be retained as the main, amalgamation address. Superscript Arabic numerals are used for such footnotes.

Abstruse

A concise and factual abstract is required. The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. An abstruse is oft presented separately from the commodity, and then it must be able to stand up alone. For this reason, References should be avoided, just if essential, then cite the author(due south) and yr(s). Also, not-standard or uncommon abbreviations should be avoided, but if essential they must be defined at their first mention in the abstruse itself.

Abstracts should not exceed 150 words.

Graphical abstract
A graphical abstruse is mandatory for this journal. Information technology should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial course designed to capture the attending of a wide readership online. Authors must provide images that conspicuously correspond the work described in the article. Graphical abstracts should be submitted as a dissever file in the online submission organisation. Image size: please provide an image with a minimum of 531 × 1328 pixels (h × w) or proportionally more. The prototype should be readable at a size of five × 13 cm using a regular screen resolution of 96 dpi. Preferred file types: TIFF, EPS, PDF or MS Office files. Y'all can view Example Graphical Abstracts on our data site.
Authors tin can brand use of Elsevier'south Analogy Services to ensure the best presentation of their images also in accordance with all technical requirements.

Highlights
Highlights are mandatory for this journal. They consist of a curt collection of bullet points that convey the cadre findings of the article and should exist submitted in a separate editable file in the online submission arrangement. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 4 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet betoken). Yous can view example Highlights on our information site.

Keywords
Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of six keywords, using British spelling and avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for case, 'and', 'of'). Be sparing with abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible. These keywords will be used for indexing purposes.

Abbreviations
Define abbreviations that are not standard in this field in a footnote to exist placed on the first page of the article. Such abbreviations that are unavoidable in the abstract must exist divers at their first mention there, too every bit in the footnote. Ensure consistency of abbreviations throughout the article.

Acknowledgements
Collate acknowledgements in a divide department at the cease of the commodity earlier the references and do not, therefore, include them on the title folio, as a footnote to the title or otherwise. List here those individuals who provided help during the enquiry (due east.thou., providing language aid, writing assistance or proof reading the article, etc.).

Formatting of funding sources
List funding sources in this standard manner to facilitate compliance to funder's requirements:

Funding: This work was supported past the National Institutes of Health [grant numbers xxxx, yyyy]; the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number zzzz]; and the U.s. Institutes of Peace [grant number aaaa].

Information technology is non necessary to include detailed descriptions on the program or type of grants and awards. When funding is from a cake grant or other resources available to a university, college, or other research institution, submit the name of the institute or organization that provided the funding.

If no funding has been provided for the inquiry, it is recommended to include the following sentence:

This research did non receive whatever specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-turn a profit sectors.

Units
Follow internationally accepted rules and conventions: use the international system of units (SI). If other units are mentioned, delight give their equivalent in SI.

Temperatures should exist given in degrees Celsius. The unit "billion" is ambiguous and should non exist used.

Abbreviations for units should follow the suggestions of the British Standards publication BS 1991. The full end should non be included in abbreviations, due east.yard. m (non m.), ppm (not p.p.m.), % and / should be used in preference to 'per cent' and 'per'. Where abbreviations are likely to cause ambiguity or may not be readily understood by an international readership, units should be put in full.

Current recognised (IUPAC) chemic nomenclature should be used, although unremarkably accepted lilliputian names may be used where there is no risk of ambiguity.

The use of proprietary names should exist avoided. Papers substantially of an advertising nature volition not be accepted.

Math formulae
Please submit math equations as editable text and not as images. Present simple formulae in line with normal text where possible and use the solidus (/) instead of a horizontal line for small-scale fractional terms, due east.g., X/Y. In principle, variables are to be presented in italics. Powers of e are often more conveniently denoted past exp. Number consecutively any equations that have to be displayed separately from the text (if referred to explicitly in the text).

  • Formulae must exist typewritten, each on a dissever line. Leave aplenty space around the formulae.
  • Subscripts and superscripts should be clear.
  • All symbols used in the formulae should be explained in the margin where they are first used. Take special care to show conspicuously the difference between zero (0) and the letter O, and between i (1) and the letter 50.
  • Give the significant of all symbols immediately after the equation in which they are first used.
  • All equations should be numbered serially at the right-hand side in parentheses.
  • The utilize of fractional powers instead of root signs is recommended.
  • Levels of statistical significance which can be mentioned without farther explanation are P< 0.05, P< 0.01 and P< 0.001.
  • In chemic formulae, valence of ions must be given as eastward.m. Ca2+ and CO2- 3, not as Ca++or CO3 --.
  • Isotope numbers should precede the symbols, e.chiliad. 18O.
  • The repeated writing of complicated chemical formulae in the text is to be avoided where reasonably possible; instead, the proper noun of the chemical compound followed by its abbreviation (ethylene-diamine-tetra-acerb acid, EDTA) should be given in full. The abridgement is to be used in the instance of a very long name or in the case of a chemical compound existence described as the end production of a gravimetric conclusion (e.grand. phosphate every bit P2O5).

Footnotes
Footnotes should exist used sparingly. Number them consecutively throughout the article. Many word processors can build footnotes into the text, and this feature may exist used. Otherwise, delight indicate the position of footnotes in the text and listing the footnotes themselves separately at the end of the article. Do not include footnotes in the Reference list.

Artwork

Electronic artwork
Full general points
• Make sure you employ uniform lettering and sizing of your original artwork.
• Embed the used fonts if the application provides that option.
• Aim to employ the following fonts in your illustrations: Arial, Courier, Times New Roman, Symbol, or use fonts that look similar.
• Number the illustrations according to their sequence in the text.
• Use a logical naming convention for your artwork files.
• Provide captions to illustrations separately.
• Size the illustrations close to the desired dimensions of the published version.
• Submit each analogy as a separate file.
• Ensure that color images are accessible to all, including those with impaired color vision.

A detailed guide on electronic artwork is available.
You are urged to visit this site; some excerpts from the detailed information are given here.
Formats
If your electronic artwork is created in a Microsoft Office application (Word, PowerPoint, Excel) and so please supply 'as is' in the native document format.
Regardless of the application used other than Microsoft Office, when your electronic artwork is finalized, please 'Salve as' or convert the images to one of the following formats (note the resolution requirements for line drawings, halftones, and line/halftone combinations given below):
EPS (or PDF): Vector drawings, embed all used fonts.
TIFF (or JPEG): Colour or grayscale photographs (halftones), keep to a minimum of 300 dpi.
TIFF (or JPEG): Bitmapped (pure black & white pixels) line drawings, keep to a minimum of 1000 dpi.
TIFF (or JPEG): Combinations bitmapped line/half-tone (color or grayscale), keep to a minimum of 500 dpi.
Delight do not:
• Supply files that are optimized for screen use (e.k., GIF, BMP, PICT, WPG); these typically accept a low number of pixels and limited set of colors;
• Supply files that are likewise low in resolution;
• Submit graphics that are disproportionately large for the content.

Color artwork
Please make sure that artwork files are in an adequate format (TIFF (or JPEG), EPS (or PDF) or MS Office files) and with the right resolution. If, together with your accustomed article, you submit usable colour figures so Elsevier will ensure, at no additional accuse, that these figures will announced in color online (e.g., ScienceDirect and other sites) in improver to colour reproduction in print. Further information on the preparation of electronic artwork.

Figure captions
Ensure that each illustration has a caption. Figures should reflect the stated results. Supply captions separately, not fastened to the effigy. A caption should comprise a cursory title (not on the figure itself) and a description of the illustration. Go along text in the illustrations themselves to a minimum but explicate all symbols and abbreviations used.

Tables

Please submit tables as editable text and not as images. Tables can be placed either next to the relevant text in the commodity, or on separate folio(s) at the stop. Number tables consecutively in accordance with their appearance in the text and place any tabular array notes below the table body. Be sparing in the apply of tables and ensure that the data presented in them exercise not duplicate results described elsewhere in the article. Please avert using vertical rules and shading in table cells.

Citation in text
Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Any references cited in the abstract must exist given in total. Unpublished results and personal communications are not recommended in the reference listing, but may be mentioned in the text. If these references are included in the reference list they should follow the standard reference way of the periodical and should include a substitution of the publication engagement with either 'Unpublished results' or 'Personal communication'. Citation of a reference as 'in press' implies that the item has been accepted for publication.

Web references
As a minimum, the total URL should be given and the date when the reference was terminal accessed. Whatever farther information, if known (DOI, author names, dates, reference to a source publication, etc.), should likewise be given. Web references can exist listed separately (due east.g., after the reference list) under a different heading if desired, or tin can exist included in the reference list.

Data references
This journal encourages you to cite underlying or relevant datasets in your manuscript by citing them in your text and including a data reference in your Reference List. Information references should include the following elements: author name(s), dataset title, data repository, version (where bachelor), year, and global persistent identifier. Add [dataset] immediately before the reference so we tin can properly identify it every bit a information reference. The [dataset] identifier will not appear in your published article.

References in a special outcome
Please ensure that the words 'this upshot' are added to any references in the list (and any citations in the text) to other articles in the aforementioned Special Issue.

Reference management software
Most Elsevier journals have their reference template available in many of the most popular reference management software products. These include all products that support Commendation Way Linguistic communication styles, such as Mendeley. Using commendation plug-ins from these products, authors only demand to select the advisable journal template when preparing their commodity, after which citations and bibliographies will be automatically formatted in the periodical's style. If no template is yet available for this journal, please follow the format of the sample references and citations as shown in this Guide. If you use reference management software, delight ensure that you remove all field codes before submitting the electronic manuscript. More information on how to remove field codes from unlike reference direction software.

Reference way
Text: Citations in the text should follow the referencing mode used by the American Psychological Association. Y'all are referred to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th Edition, ISBN 978-1-4338-3215-4, copies of which may be ordered online.
List: references should exist arranged first alphabetically and then further sorted chronologically if necessary. More than than 1 reference from the same author(s) in the same yr must be identified by the letters 'a', 'b', 'c', etc., placed after the year of publication.
Examples:
Reference to a journal publication:
Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J. A. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2010). The art of writing a scientific article. Journal of Scientific Communications, 163, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sc.2010.00372.
Reference to a journal publication with an article number:
Van der Geer, J., Hanraads, J. A. J., & Lupton, R. A. (2018). The art of writing a scientific article. Heliyon, nineteen, Article e00205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00205.
Reference to a volume:
Strunk, W., Jr., & White, Eastward. B. (2000). The elements of style (quaternary ed.). Longman (Affiliate four).
Reference to a chapter in an edited book:
Mettam, G. R., & Adams, Fifty. B. (2009). How to prepare an electronic version of your article. In B. S. Jones, & R. Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the electronic age (pp. 281–304). E-Publishing Inc.
Reference to a website:
Powertech Systems. (2015). Lithium-ion vs lead-acrid cost analysis. Retrieved from http://www.powertechsystems.eu/home/tech-corner/lithium-ion-vs-pb-acid-cost-analysis/. Accessed January 6, 2016
Reference to a dataset:
[dataset] Oguro, M., Imahiro, S., Saito, Due south., & Nakashizuka, T. (2015). Mortality data for Japanese oak wilt illness and surrounding woods compositions. Mendeley Data, v1. https://doi.org/10.17632/xwj98nb39r.i.
Reference to a briefing newspaper or affiche presentation:
Engle, E.K., Greenbacks, T.F., & Jarry, J.L. (2009, November). The Body Image Behaviours Inventory-3: Development and validation of the Trunk Paradigm Compulsive Actions and Body Image Avoidance Scales. Poster session presentation at the coming together of the Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies, New York, NY.
Reference to software:
Coon, Eastward., Berndt, One thousand., Jan, A., Svyatsky, D., Atchley, A., Kikinzon, E., Harp, D., Manzini, G., Shelef, E., Lipnikov, 1000., Garimella, R., Xu, C., Moulton, D., Karra, South., Painter, S., Jafarov, East., & Molins, Southward. (2020, March 25). Advanced Terrestrial Simulator (ATS) v0.88 (Version 0.88). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3727209.

Video

Elsevier accepts video material and animation sequences to support and raise your scientific research. Authors who have video or animation files that they wish to submit with their commodity are strongly encouraged to include links to these inside the trunk of the article. This can be done in the aforementioned way as a figure or table by referring to the video or animation content and noting in the torso text where it should be placed. All submitted files should be properly labeled so that they direct chronicle to the video file's content. In lodge to ensure that your video or animation material is direct usable, please provide the file in 1 of our recommended file formats with a preferred maximum size of 150 MB per file, 1 GB in total. Video and animation files supplied will be published online in the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Spider web products, including ScienceDirect. Please supply 'stills' with your files: you tin cull any frame from the video or animation or brand a separate image. These will be used instead of standard icons and will personalize the link to your video information. For more detailed instructions please visit our video didactics pages. Note: since video and animation cannot be embedded in the print version of the journal, please provide text for both the electronic and the impress version for the portions of the article that refer to this content.

Data visualization

Include interactive data visualizations in your publication and let your readers interact and engage more closely with your research. Follow the instructions hither to find out about bachelor data visualization options and how to include them with your commodity.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material such every bit applications, images and sound clips, can be published with your article to heighten it. Submitted supplementary items are published exactly as they are received (Excel or PowerPoint files will announced as such online). Please submit your material together with the article and supply a concise, descriptive explanation for each supplementary file. If you wish to brand changes to supplementary material during any stage of the procedure, please brand sure to provide an updated file. Exercise not annotate any corrections on a previous version. Please switch off the 'Track Changes' option in Microsoft Office files every bit these will announced in the published version.

Research data

This journal encourages and enables you to share information that supports your research publication where appropriate, and enables you to interlink the data with your published articles. Research data refers to the results of observations or experimentation that validate research findings. To facilitate reproducibility and data reuse, this periodical also encourages yous to share your software, code, models, algorithms, protocols, methods and other useful materials related to the project.

Beneath are a number of means in which you tin associate data with your article or make a argument about the availability of your data when submitting your manuscript. If you are sharing data in one of these ways, yous are encouraged to cite the data in your manuscript and reference list. Please refer to the "References" department for more information virtually data citation. For more information on depositing, sharing and using research data and other relevant enquiry materials, visit the research data page.

Data linking
If you have made your research information available in a data repository, yous tin link your article straight to the dataset. Elsevier collaborates with a number of repositories to link articles on ScienceDirect with relevant repositories, giving readers access to underlying information that gives them a better agreement of the research described.

There are unlike means to link your datasets to your article. When available, you tin direct link your dataset to your article by providing the relevant information in the submission arrangement. For more information, visit the database linking folio.

For supported data repositories a repository banner volition automatically appear next to your published commodity on ScienceDirect.

In improver, you tin link to relevant data or entities through identifiers within the text of your manuscript, using the following format: Database: xxxx (e.g., TAIR: AT1G01020; CCDC: 734053; PDB: 1XFN).

Mendeley Data
This periodical supports Mendeley Data, enabling you to deposit any research data (including raw and processed data, video, code, software, algorithms, protocols, and methods) associated with your manuscript in a gratis-to-use, open access repository. During the submission process, afterwards uploading your manuscript, you volition take the opportunity to upload your relevant datasets directly to Mendeley Data. The datasets will be listed and directly accessible to readers next to your published article online.

For more information, visit the Mendeley Data for journals page.

Information statement
To foster transparency, we encourage you to state the availability of your data in your submission. This may be a requirement of your funding body or institution. If your data is unavailable to access or unsuitable to mail service, you will have the opportunity to indicate why during the submission process, for example by stating that the research information is confidential. The argument will appear with your published article on ScienceDirect. For more information, visit the Data Statement page.

Online proof correction

To ensure a fast publication process of the article, nosotros kindly ask authors to provide us with their proof corrections within two days. Corresponding authors will receive an e-mail with a link to our online proofing system, assuasive annotation and correction of proofs online. The environment is similar to MS Discussion: in addition to editing text, y'all can besides comment on figures/tables and answer questions from the Copy Editor. Web-based proofing provides a faster and less mistake-decumbent procedure by assuasive you to directly type your corrections, eliminating the potential introduction of errors.
If preferred, you can still cull to annotate and upload your edits on the PDF version. All instructions for proofing will be given in the e-post we transport to authors, including culling methods to the online version and PDF.
We will do everything possible to get your article published quickly and accurately. Delight use this proof but for checking the typesetting, editing, completeness and definiteness of the text, tables and figures. Significant changes to the article every bit accepted for publication will only be considered at this stage with permission from the Editor. Information technology is important to ensure that all corrections are sent back to usa in one communication. Please bank check carefully before replying, every bit inclusion of any subsequent corrections cannot be guaranteed. Proofreading is solely your responsibleness.

Offprints

The respective author will, at no cost, receive a customized Share Link providing l days gratuitous admission to the final published version of the commodity on ScienceDirect. The Share Link can be used for sharing the commodity via whatsoever communication channel, including email and social media. For an extra charge, paper offprints tin can be ordered via the offprint order form which is sent once the commodity is accepted for publication. Both corresponding and co-authors may order offprints at whatever time via Elsevier'south Author Services. Respective authors who have published their commodity gold open access do not receive a Share Link as their final published version of the commodity is available open admission on ScienceDirect and tin can be shared through the article DOI link.



Please get carefully through the post-obit points dealing with the main weak points often detectable in the current submission.

  • The presentation linguistic communication must exist adequate for submission to JFF equally an English language periodical. If not done adequately, the manuscript may be rejected without review. An English language editing service is available through Elsevier at: https://webshop.elsevier.com/language-editing-services/language-editing/
  • Avoid every bit much equally possible the use acronyms in the abstract and limit their use also in the text
  • A graphical abstract is mandatory
  • Double-spaced text of your paper and number both the pages and lines; continuous line numbering is essential as allow reviewers to easily locate their comments
  • Use 4 Highlights of maximum 1 line
  • Practice not contact the editor-in-main to ask if your manuscript is suitable for submission to the periodical. This is a decision y'all accept to brand. There is no pre-screening of papers exterior the electronic system. All papers should be submitted via the electronic submission system.
  • Authorship, include only those who take meaningfully contributed to the work; others could exist placed in the acknowledgement section. For more information on authorship delight refer to: https://www.elsevier.com/journal-authors/ethics#authorship
  • When suggesting 3 potential reviewers for your paper, please note that: These should not be from your own establishment and mayhap no more than one be from your land. These must exist expert in the field and not suggested for other reasons (such equally collaborators of any sort). Please notation that your reviewer suggestions will not always exist used.
  • Make clear in the alphabetic character to the editor the relevance of your paper to the area of the interest for JFF and to the specific research field. Novelty of the work and how it contribute to the knowledge in the field must be highlighted and explained both in the text of the manuscript and briefly in the embrace letter.
  • For review papers list in the comprehend letter the review recently published on related topic and explain why the submitted review is needed and differ from those already published.
  • Proper review and citation of fundamental papers in the field is essential and their absence crusade paper rejection. Especially previous newspaper from your own group must be highlighted and when needed explain in the letter to editor while the manuscript bring new results respect to those already provided in your previous paper.
  • Do not dissever your research in ii or more than newspaper if this is not absolutely paper. JFF reject papers merely reporting side data from other studies.


  • Credit must be given to prior work explicitly or else quoting of sentences, paragraphs or tables without commendation is prohibited and results in rejection of papers. Information technology should be noted that all manuscripts are screened through anti-plagiarism software, and excessive reproduction of previously published text will effect in rejection of manuscripts without review. Further information can exist obtained from: https://www.elsevier.com/journal-authors/ethics#writing-an-commodity
  • Submission to more than than 1 periodical is a very serious breach of publication ethics and such papers will exist rejected, as would be use of other authors' piece of work or fifty-fifty your own without reference citation. Further information can exist obtained from: https://www.elsevier.com/journal-authors/ethics#writing-an-article
  • When using homo or animal subjects, protocols equally well as permission details must be provided. Further information can exist found at: https://www.elsevier.com/periodical-authors/ethics#conducting-research
  • For total papers the usual length is 7500 words (excluding references) with no more than 8 illustrations (tables plus figures).
  • For curt advice, 2500 words (excluding references) and a maximum of 4 illustrations (tables plus figures) is permitted.
  • For review articles, it is best to keep them at 10,000-12,000 (excluding references) words. The usual number of references for full papers is about 40, for short communication twenty-25 and for reviews may vary but usually up to 150.
  • All tables, figures should be understandable without reference to the text and exist able to stand alone; abbreviations must therefore be defined in table headings / footnotes and figure captions. Abbreviations should also be fully defined on offset use in the abstract and the main text.
  • The way of the Journal of Functional Foods for referencing, both in the text and at the end must exist followed. Please avert using words that are not usually used or abbreviations that are confusing. Authors must define the starting materials and details of bioactives responsible for the observed furnishings, both by identifying and quantifying them. Structure-activity relationships discussion is essential in nigh cases.
  • In instance you are asked to revise your manuscript prepare the rebuttal in the point to signal" form writing your respond beneath the question raised by Editors and reviewers and indicating which part of the manuscript was modified when necessary. In the revised version all the modifications respect to the original submission must be highlighted
  • The editor-in-chief or acquaintance editors should not exist contacted for purposes of the review process or otherwise unless there is a special circumstance. Issues associated with submission and technical issues should be addressed to Elsevier'due south staff
  • For retrieving of password and other related problems such as your Elsevier consolidated account, y'all also need to contact the Elsevier Publishing Back up Center and non the editors.
  • The review procedure takes usually between thirty and 60 days. It can be delayed considering it is quite challenging to detect good reviewers. Before complaining inquire yourself how many times you decline or even do not reply when y'all are requested to peer review a paper
"

robinsonbeppiest.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.elsevier.com/journals/journal-of-functional-foods/1756-4646/guide-for-authors

0 Response to "Can You Use Schematic From Review Articles in Your Poster"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel